Remember the guy that made the YouTube video? You know, the video that murdered a U.S. Ambassador and other U.S. citizens. Well, you can rest easy: he's been sentenced to a year in prison. No more killer videos for him! I feel safer.
I don't know that it's much consolation to the father of Tyrone Woods that Hillary keept her promise that, "We will make sure that the person who made that film is arrested and prosecuted." But at least he didn't find out about his son's death while watching the caskets being unloded on television.
Austin G. Hart
Libertarian-leaning Republican. Loudmouth. Evil banker. Inspired by Milton Friedman. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
Wednesday, November 7, 2012
Fuck White People (Take that Mitches)
Fuck White People
Take That Mitches
Well that certainly sounds racist... But it can't be because they're Democrats, see? Only Republicans are racist.
On the upside, at least all the calls for rioting went unheeded. Maybe all the democrats that were calling for riots suddenly remembered that sencond amendment supporters tend to vote republican.
Stay classy Democrats!
Take That Mitches
Well that certainly sounds racist... But it can't be because they're Democrats, see? Only Republicans are racist.
On the upside, at least all the calls for rioting went unheeded. Maybe all the democrats that were calling for riots suddenly remembered that sencond amendment supporters tend to vote republican.
Stay classy Democrats!
Bye Bye Filibuster?
It looks like Harry Reid is talking about changing the filibuster. He does realize that, at some point, the Republicans will regain control of the house, right? Seems a bit short-sighted to me.
Pitfalls of Choosing a Moderate Candidate
Some quick observations on where our last two candidates
have fallen on the political spectrum:
The median voter theorem suggests that the politician whose
preferences are closest to the median voter will win. However, in the last two presidential
elections, Republicans have put forth very moderate candidates against a
candidate whose positions seem far enough left that the Republican should have
won.
This makes me wonder: It seems that as a politician
approaches or crosses the median, there seems to be a sort of an increase in
the “elasticity of voting propensity” at the tail that moves inward as the
candidate moves farther from their side. That is: incremental moves toward the
other side result in an increasing rate of decline in voter propensity at the
base. (This would be similar to the way that price elasticity of demand changes
as one moves along the demand curve.)
If voting bases do behave this way, then it seems that it
would make sense to nominate candidates that are clearly to the right of center.
This would also help better distinguish our platform from theirs. Besides, if
we don’t look much different than the other side, then why should anyone in the
middle pick us over them?
I suppose this observation is nothing new, but Republicans
often seem to be pushing for moderation and compromise while Democrats often
stake out hard positions on the left. Perhaps the push for compromise is an attempt
to counter Democrats’ unfair portrayal of Republicans, but in doing so, we’re helping
cement that image and fighting on their terms.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)